MMTLP
ACCOUNTABILITY TELEMETRYFINRA Rule 6440(a)(3) Ticker Retirement
Dec 09, 2022 • 06:30 AM EST
UNLISTED PRIVATE REGISTRATION
--Years
--Months
--Days
--Hours
--Minutes
--Seconds
---Total Days Elapsed
---Sessions Since Retirement
---Total Secs Elapsed
Chapter 1: The Corporate Lineage (2007 – 2020)
Forensic Regulatory Audit

MMTLP for Dummies:
Where It All Started

Before there was MMTLP, before Meta Materials, and before the trading halt, there was an oil promotion company called Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.

And before Torchlight ever drilled an exploratory hole in the ground, its legal foundation was an inactive public shell created for a Florida pole-dancing fitness studio called Pole Perfect Studios, Inc.

The 30-Second Dossier Summary
1. The Clean Public Shell

Torchlight did not complete a traditional Wall Street IPO. It bought an existing public corporate shell for $270,000 cash to immediately access a public stock ticker.

2. The Midland Oil Partner

Midland geologist Greg McCabe supplied the ~172,000-acre Orogrande Basin leases, served as Chairman, owned over 7x more stock than CEO John Brda (17.09% vs 2.34%), and loaned millions to keep the company alive.

3. The 10-Year Operating Record

Across 10 years of public trading (2011–2020), Torchlight never generated an annual profit, burned -$111.9 million in cash, and carried $0.00 in proved commercial oil reserves on its balance sheet.

Initial Startup Cash
$29,000
Raised from 14 subscribers
Shell Acquisition Cost
$270,000
Cash paid for public ticker
Orogrande Basin Leases
~172,000 Acres
Hudspeth Co. wildcat land
10-Year Lifetime Deficit
-$111.9 Million
Audited SEC Form 10-K
Act I • The Clean Shell Entity

What Was Pole Perfect Studios, Inc.?

The factual corporate lineage of the public vehicle—forensically reconstructed from primary SEC EDGAR filings, state charters, and FINRA regulatory disclosures.

Exhibit 01 • OTC Shell Dossier
Legal InceptionNevada
October 30, 2007
CIK #0001431959 • Ticker: $PPFT
Executive OfficeResidential
Tammy Skalko Residence
3457 Rockcliff Pl, Longwood, FL
3-Year Total RevenueAudited 10-K
$0.00 Total Sales
Operating Deficit: -$71,388

Retail market lore often claims that Pole Perfect Studios, Inc. was simply an innocent, failed dance studio started by a lone female fitness instructor. Primary sworn filings with the SEC reveal an entirely different corporate reality: Pole Perfect Studios was organized from day one as a classic microcap corporate vehicle structured with seasoned penny-stock financiers and licensed securities personnel.

Incorporated in Nevada on October 30, 2007, the enterprise issued 3,600,000 founder shares split equally among three individuals for an aggregate cash contribution of $29,000 ($9,667 each). On May 2, 2008, the company filed a Form S-1 Registration Statement (SEC File No. 333-150616), took the public ticker symbol $PPFT on the OTC Bulletin Board, and began maintaining clean, active quarterly reporting status.

Primary EDGAR Discovery: The Three Founding Partners (3,600,000 Shares)
1,200,000 Shares Each
President, CEO & Director
Tammy L. Skalko (Age 35)

Graduate of Rollins College (BS in Organizational Communication). Spent 11 years as a luxury residential real estate broker in Central Florida (Park Place Properties). Disclosed committing up to 15 hours per week at zero salary to Pole Perfect.

Secretary & Director
James Beshara (Age 57)

Real estate developer since 1973 and former CEO of B&B Construction. Sworn S-1 disclosures identify him as a serial microcap financier who funded Alternative Construction Company, Solar Nights Industries, and Phantom Entertainment.

Official Control Person
Harry Chase Stone II (Age 45)

Licensed Wall Street stockbroker (FINRA CRD #1961250; Series 7, 24, 55, 63). Former Director of Corporate Finance (2003–2007) at Park Financial Group—the Florida brokerage penalized by the SEC in April 2007 for aiding pump-and-dump operations.

The Shell Creation Network: Finders, Agents & Legal Architects
Consulting Entity Share Grants (Oct 31, 2007)

One day after incorporation, Pole Perfect issued 154,639 shares for $3,000 in services to two corporate entities: Heartland Managed Risk, LLC (77,320 shares) and Ramsgate Group, Inc. (77,319 shares). Heartland was operated by Ronald A. Davis (ex-Goldman Sachs/Dean Witter), whose firm Genesis Corporate Development provided the Henderson, Nevada registered office and California contact number.

Securities Attorney & Independent Auditor

The legal opinion verifying the validity of the public stock offering was authored by microcap securities attorney Timothy S. Orr, Esq. (Spokane, WA). Audits of the financial statements were performed by Patrick Rodgers, CPA, PA (Altamonte Springs, FL)—a recurring auditor across regional OTC penny-stock shells.

In Plain English: Why an Inactive Studio Was Worth $270,000 to John Brda

Pole Perfect never leased a commercial building, never hired instructors, and never taught a single paying customer. By Q3 2010, its bank balance had dwindled to $973, sustained only by a $2,000 convertible note. But what it did possess was priceless to penny-stock operators: an active, debt-free, SEC-registered public corporate shell with an existing ticker ($PPFT) and pre-registered public shares. Purchasing this shell allowed Torchlight Energy to bypass an expensive, months-long Wall Street IPO and begin trading publicly in under 30 days.

Pre-Merger Capital Structure:
3.60M Founder Shares+154k Consulting Shares+547k S-1 Public Float=4,301,734 Total Shares ($PPFT)
1. The 9.3x Founder Cash-OutForm 8-K Proof

When Torchlight closed the acquisition on November 23, 2010, the three founders (Skalko, Beshara, and Stone) surrendered their 3,600,000 shares for cancellation in exchange for $270,000 cash ($90,000 each). Having invested $9,667 each in 2007, they realized a 9.3x return on a company that never earned $1 in revenue.

2. The Unbroken Float Survival701,730 Shares Retained

While the 3,600,000 founder shares were cancelled, the remaining 701,730 shares (the public S-1 buyers and consulting finders) remained outstanding. Combined with 2,361,125 newly issued shares handed to Torchlight owners, the newly minted oil company entered trading with exactly 3,062,855 shares.

Act II • The Executive Promoter

Who Is John Brda?

The verified corporate background, prior federal litigation, executive compensation, and regulatory charges of the microcap consultant who took Torchlight public and guided it to the MMTLP dividend.

Dossier • Chief Promoter
John A. Brda, former CEO and Promoter of Torchlight Energy Resources
Click to Enlarge
SEC Civil Defendant
John A. Brda
CEO & Director • Torchlight Energy (2014–2021)
Subject MetadataVerified SEC Record
Jurisdiction:Warson Woods / Wildwood, MO
Advisory Firm:Brda & Company LLC
Federal Docket:SDNY 1:24-cv-04806
Academic:B.S. Finance (SIU '88)
Executive Subject Dossier • SEC Rule 405 Promoter

John A. Brda

Consultant • Chief Executive Officer of Torchlight Energy Resources (2014–2021)

Based in the St. Louis metropolitan area (Warson Woods & Wildwood, Missouri), John Brda was not a petroleum geologist, petroleum engineer, or wildcat driller. He was a microcap financial consultant who specialized in public shell acquisitions, corporate reverse mergers, and retail investor promotion through his boutique firm Brda & Company LLC.

After entering Torchlight through the 2010 reverse takeover of Pole Perfect Studios, Brda served as President before succeeding Tom Lapinski as Chief Executive Officer in December 2014. Throughout his seven-year tenure as CEO, Brda orchestrated repeated equity-for-debt exchanges, retail-focused promotional campaigns, and ultimately the June 2021 reverse merger with Metamaterial Inc. that created the Series A Preferred dividend structure.

Initial Merger Stake (2010)
795,625 Shares
26.0% Voting Control (Pre-Transfers)
SEC Form 3 & 13D
Peak Cash Comp (2020)
$1,348,771
$375k Base + $600k Bonus + Options
SEC Form DEF 14A
Change-of-Control Grant
2.25M Options
Vested strictly on 2021 merger
SEC Form 4 (July 2020)
In Plain English: What Does an Official SEC “Promoter” Do?

In federal securities law, a “Promoter” is a formal regulatory designation under SEC Rule 405. It defines the individual who takes the initiative in founding and organizing a corporate enterprise, arranging its public financing, and marketing its stock to the public. John Brda did not drill subterranean wells; he managed corporate shell mergers, SEC compliance, debt workouts, social media public relations, and retail investor excitement.

Executive Background & Competency AuditSworn Primary Records
Academic Credentials
B.S. in Finance (1988)

Graduated from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Never licensed by FINRA/NASD as a registered broker or investment banker.

Microcap Financial Advisory
Brda & Company LLC

Operated his private boutique advisory practice from Warson Woods, MO, advising emerging OTC issuers on capital structure and public shells.

Petroleum Geology
Zero Technical Training

Held no professional geology licenses or engineering qualifications; relied exclusively on third-party operators and Chairman Greg McCabe.

Pre-Torchlight Forensic Record: Prior State & Federal Judicial Rulings
Court Dockets
Missouri State Court207 S.W.3d 680
STL Capital Management v. John Brda (2004–2006)

Sued in Missouri state court for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and diversion of corporate opportunities regarding 500,000 shares of Limelight Media Group (LMG). In October 2005, the court entered judgment against Brda, finding he breached his duty of loyalty. When Brda violated an injunction and secretly sold shares to pocket $31,416.68, the trial judge held him in civil contempt of court, ordering him to disgorge proceeds to purge the contempt.

U.S. Federal CourtCase 5:07-cv-04107
Armstrong v. American Pallet Leasing (2007–2012)

In November 2007—the exact month Pole Perfect Studios was formed—Brda was sued in federal district court (N.D. Iowa) under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and federal securities laws alongside penny-stock promoters Craig Medoff and Curt Kramer. In September 2012, a $900,000 default judgment was entered against Brda, which was later conditionally vacated after Brda entered a settlement requiring him to file a sworn explanatory affidavit.

Shell Reverse MergerForm 3 Nov 2010

795,625 Initial Shares Acquired

When Pole Perfect acquired Torchlight in November 2010, Brda received 795,625 shares (26% voting power). Per Form 3 footnote disclosures, Brda transferred 67,500 shares to finders, gifted 100,000 shares to his father, and retained 628,125 shares (45,625 direct + 582,500 through Brda & Company LLC).

Executive CompensationDEF 14A Disclosures

$240k to $375k Base Salary + Options

Brda began as President in 2011 with a $240,000 base salary. Upon succeeding Tom Lapinski as CEO in December 2014, his base salary was increased by 25% to $375,000 per year, accompanied by a 3,000,000 stock option grant in June 2015.

July 2020 IncentiveForm 4 Filing

The 2.25M Change-of-Control Options

On July 15, 2020—while Torchlight faced insolvency and a $25M debt wall—the Board granted Brda 2,250,000 stock options (375k at $0.50, 1.875M at $1.00) that only vested upon a “change of control” (merger) prior to July 15, 2021. This created an urgent personal financial incentive to execute a reverse takeover.

Federal Court ComplaintCase 1:24-cv-04806

June 2024 SEC Fraud & Manipulation Charges

The SEC charged Brda and Meta CEO George Palikaras with federal securities fraud, alleging they orchestrated a deceptive market manipulation scheme by hyping the MMTLP preferred dividend to trigger a retail “short squeeze” while secretly dumping $137.5 million of newly issued common stock into the market via ATM facilities.

SEC Primary Evidence: Brda's Internal Direction to Palikaras

“We have two days... to take advantage of the squeeze...”

Documented in federal court filings by the SEC, this communication was sent by John Brda to George Palikaras immediately after the first day of Torchlight's June 2021 ATM offering, directing the execution of multi-million dollar equity sales while retail investors were encouraged on social media to hold and buy shares for the dividend.

Exhibit 1-A: Public Admission Before the U3 Halt (Nov 30, 2022)
Status ID: 1598055404214579201
Permanent Forensic Archive • Primary Evidence Preserved Offline

Status: Cryptographically mirrored to prevent deletion or alteration

John Brda
John Brda
@johnbrda
Got call from reputable friend. Some funds still don't understand that they will not be able to trade MMTLP after the record date. They have no clue that the spinout takes all the value away from MMTLP. They assume FINRA will just allow trading to continue, but who would buy?
GIF
3:44 PM · Nov 30, 2022·9 days before FINRA U3 Halt (Dec 9, 2022)
Verify on X.com
32 Replies 89 Reposts 334 Likes Share
Forensic Significance: Why This Specific Tweet Matters
1. Knowledge of Trading Cessation

Nine days before FINRA halted trading on December 9, 2022, Brda explicitly acknowledged that MMTLP would not be able to trade after the record date, directly contradicting subsequent community narratives claiming trading should have continued through December 12/14.

2. Recognition of Zero Post-Spinout Value

Brda noted that "the spinout takes all the value away from MMTLP" and asked "who would buy?", reflecting clear understanding that an uncertificated shell placeholder after the record date had no intrinsic economic value.

3. Discrediting the "Unforeseen Halt" Narrative

While retail activists later characterized FINRA's action as an unprecedented, unpredictable intervention, Brda's tweet demonstrates that insiders and market participants were actively discussing the impossibility of post-record trading well over a week in advance.

Act III • The Strategy & Mechanics

How Did Brda Find It & What Were His Intentions?

John Brda did not discover Pole Perfect by chance. In the microcap penny-stock industry, corporate shells are traded off-the-shelf through an established network of finders, shell brokers, and securities attorneys.

Deal Room • Market Match
The Microcap Reverse Takeover Arbitrage

Why do promoters buy dormant public shells instead of doing a standard Wall Street IPO?

Traditional Wall St. IPO
$1.5M+ & 18 Months
Clean Shell Acquisition
$270k & 30 Days
Step 1: The “Clean Shell” MarketplaceOff-the-Shelf

How Promoters Buy Public Companies Off the Shelf

In the microcap ecosystem, an entire cottage industry of securities lawyers and shell brokers specializes in maintaining dormant public companies. When a promoter like John Brda wants to take an asset public without spending $1M+ and 18 months on an underwritten Wall Street IPO, he contacts securities attorneys and asks: “Who has a clean, SEC-reporting shell with no debt and an active ticker ready to sell right now?”

Step 2: Pole Perfect Was Actively on the Market22-Day Window

The Failed LumiGene Technologies Deal (November 1, 2010)

Regulatory records prove Pole Perfect was being actively marketed to private startups. On August 18, 2010, Pole Perfect signed a Letter of Intent with a private biotechnology startup called LumiGene Technologies, Inc. That merger fell apart, and on November 1, 2010—just 22 days before Torchlight signed—Pole Perfect filed a Form 8-K announcing the termination and stating:

Official SEC Exhibit 99.1 Press Release:
“Pole Perfect Studios is currently investigating other acquisition candidates and plans to enter into an agreement with another candidate as soon as practical.”
Step 3: The Matchmakers & Finder Fees67,500 Shares Paid

Securities Counsel & 67,500 Shares Transferred

Both parties used seasoned microcap attorneys: Joseph L. Cannella at Eaton & Van Winkle LLP (New York) represented Pole Perfect, while Robert D. Axelrod at Axelrod, Smith & Kirshbaum (Houston) represented Torchlight. In John Brda's Schedule 13D filing (Item 3), Brda formally disclosed that he transferred 67,500 common shares to two finders as payment for introducing Torchlight to Pole Perfect Studios.

Step 4: Why Pole Perfect Fit Brda's 4-Point Checklist
1. Zero Liabilities

Pole Perfect never opened a physical fitness studio, meaning zero bank debt, zero commercial lease obligations, and zero pending lawsuits.

2. 100% Current with SEC

Tammy Skalko kept quarterly Form 10-Q and annual Form 10-K filings completely up to date with zero delinquent gaps or regulatory stop orders.

3. Established Public Float

701,730 shares (547,095 public S-1 shares plus 154,639 consulting shares) remained in circulation, providing an instant public float ready for immediate secondary trading under ticker $PPFT.

4. Rapid Cash Buyout

Torchlight purchased and cancelled all 3,600,000 founder shares for $270,000 in cash ($90,000 each to Skalko, Beshara, and Stone)—giving the founders a 9.3x return while Torchlight secured an active public vehicle.

The Bottom Line on Intentions

Pole Perfect Studios was not a coincidence. It was inventory sitting on the microcap shell market. It had just fallen out of contract with a biotechnology startup (LumiGene), finders presented it to Brda and Lapinski, Brda paid the finders 67,500 shares for making the introduction, and Torchlight paid $270,000 cash to acquire an immediate public stock ticker.

Act IV • Corporate Genesis

How Was Torchlight Conceived?

The chronological timeline of how private oil leases in Wilson County, Texas were paired with an inactive fitness studio shell to birth Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.

Genesis • Reverse Merger
In Plain English: What Is a “Reverse Merger”?

In a standard IPO, a private operating company applies to Wall Street to go public. In a reverse merger (also called a reverse takeover), the process is flipped backwards: the private owners buy a publicly registered corporate shell that has no active business, roll their private assets into it, change its legal name, and walk away controlling a publicly listed company on day one.

Voting Power Split Post-Merger (November 2010):58% Combined Insider Control
Thomas Lapinski
37.5% Stake
Initial CEO & Geologist
John Brda
20.5% Stake
President & Promoter
Public Float
42.0% Float
Original 14 Shareholders
Step 1 • June 2010 – August 2010SEC Form D

Thomas Lapinski & John Brda Form Private Torchlight Energy

Thomas Lapinski, an oil exploration manager with operational experience in Texas, held exploratory drilling leases in Marcelina Creek (Wilson County, Texas) but needed capital. Lapinski partnered with John Brda to take the asset public. On June 25, 2010, they incorporated private Torchlight Energy, Inc. in Nevada.

On August 9, 2010, they submitted an SEC Form D filing disclosing a private placement of securities. Thomas Lapinski was listed as Chief Executive Officer, and John Brda was officially declared as the Promoter—the individual responsible for organizing and structuring the business vehicle.

Step 2 • November 23, 2010SEC Form 8-K

The Reverse Merger into Pole Perfect Studios

On November 23, 2010, Lapinski, Brda, and the owners of Pole Perfect Studios executed a formal Share Exchange Agreement:

Pole Perfect formally terminated its fitness dance studio operations.
Private Torchlight was acquired as a wholly owned operating subsidiary.
Pole Perfect founder shares cancelled for $270,000 cash.
Lapinski (37.5%) & Brda (20.5%) secured 58% combined control.
Step 3 • January 13, 2011SEC Schedule 14C

The Official Rebranding to Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.

On January 13, 2011, Lapinski and Brda executed a written corporate consent amending the Nevada Articles of Incorporation, officially changing the company's legal name from Pole Perfect Studios, Inc. to Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.

That same month, Torchlight entered into an executive employment agreement with John Brda, appointing him President and Secretary with an initial base salary of $240,000 per year plus equity incentives.

Step 4 • December 2014 – 2020Executive Succession

John Brda Becomes CEO of Torchlight

In December 2014, Thomas Lapinski resigned, and John Brda took over as Chief Executive Officer of Torchlight Energy Resources. Over the next six years, Brda managed Torchlight's public offerings, debt financing, and exploratory lease acquisitions in West Texas—operating with only four full-time employees while maintaining a public listing on Nasdaq.

By late 2020, facing substantial operating debt, exploratory drilling commitments, and impending Nasdaq delisting notices, Torchlight reached a crossroads—setting the stage for the dramatic corporate transaction that would alter the company's trajectory forever.

Act V • The Midland Geologist & Chairman (2014–2021)

Who Is Greg McCabe?

The Midland oilman who provided the ~172,000-acre Orogrande Basin, served as Chairman of the Board, and owned over seven times more common stock than CEO John Brda.

Asset Provider • 17.09% Stake
Gregory McCabe, Chairman & CEO of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons and former Chairman of Torchlight Energy
Click to Enlarge
Asset Provider & Chairman
Gregory McCabe
Chairman & CEO • Next Bridge Hydrocarbons
Subject MetadataPrimary Oil Operator
Base of Operations:Midland, Texas (Permian)
Operating Entity:McCabe Petroleum Corp.
Regulatory Standing:Uncharged by SEC
Academic:B.S. Geology (UT Arlington '83)
Executive Subject Dossier • Boardroom Hegemony

Gregory McCabe

Petroleum Geologist • Chairman & CEO of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons • Chairman of Torchlight (2016–2021)

Based in Midland, Texas, Gregory McCabe holds a B.S. in Geology from the University of Texas at Arlington (1983) and brings over 42 years of independent oil and gas operating experience across the Permian Basin (McCabe Petroleum Corporation, founded 1989). Unlike John Brda—a microcap financial consultant from Missouri—McCabe was an authentic West Texas petroleum geologist who owned the mineral rights, held the drilling leases, and controlled the land Torchlight promoted. On September 25, 2026, McCabe broke a 3.5-year public silence on "Going Rogue with Lara Logan" (Ep 99.2), framing himself as a seasoned oilfield negotiator confronting regulatory failure.

McCabe was the indispensable institutional backbone and primary lender to Torchlight. While CEO John Brda focused on public shell transactions, press releases, and social media marketing, McCabe owned the underlying mineral assets, advanced millions in senior debt whenever corporate treasury reserves dried up, and held triple-lock contractual protections guaranteeing his capital recovery regardless of public stock performance.

Beneficial Ownership (2020)
17.09%
17,648,390 Common Shares
SEC Form DEF 14A
Hegemony vs. CEO Brda
~7.3× Multiple
17.09% McCabe vs. 2.34% Brda
Proxy Statement Voting Power
Flagship Leasehold
~172,000 Acres
Hudspeth Co. Orogrande Basin
Aug 2014 Definitive Agmt
In Plain English: Why McCabe Held the Real Power

CEO John Brda was the public face of Torchlight on retail podcasts and investor calls. But Greg McCabe was the institutional backbone. McCabe owned the land leases Torchlight promoted, chaired the Board of Directors, owned over seven times more equity than Brda (17.09% vs. 2.34%), and acted as the company's lender of last resort—loaning millions in debt whenever Torchlight ran out of cash to drill.

September 2026 Milestone: McCabe Breaks 3.5-Year Silence (Going Rogue Ep 99.2)Broadcast Admission • Lara Logan Interview
1. The Calculated Silence

McCabe admitted he stayed publicly silent for 3.5 years to let the regulatory and judicial process play out: “I've been very cautious not to speak out until I let the process play out. The process has officially played out. It's taken three and a half years... right now it's time for our story to be told.”

2. Division of Labor

McCabe verified his boardroom separation from CEO Brda on camera: “John Brda was the CEO of the company that ran Torchlight and I was the Chairman.” Brda handled the promotional retail facing, while McCabe controlled the land and the board.

3. 40M S-1 Offering Failure

McCabe admitted Next Bridge's May 28, 2024 S-1 offering 40M shares to short sellers through Roth Capital yielded zero participation: “How's it going? Terrible. Not one single person has reached out to settle their bets... not one single inquiry.”

McCabe's Triple-Lock Contract (August 7, 2014)Risk-Free Protection
Lock #1 • Revenue Off The Top
4.5% ORRI Royalty

Guaranteed royalty cut of every barrel produced before Torchlight pays operating expenses.

Lock #2 • Post-Payout Upside
10.0% Back-In Working Interest

Contractual right to take 10% of operating profits once initial drilling capital is recovered.

Lock #3 • Default Protection
Full Reversionary Rights

If Torchlight fails to drill or lets leases expire, full ownership title automatically reverts to McCabe.

The Five Pillars of McCabe's Dominance & Legal Admissions

Pillar 1 • The Genesis Deal & Leases

Selling Torchlight Its Crown Jewel (172,000 Acres)

Torchlight did not discover the Orogrande Basin; Greg McCabe brought it to them. On August 7, 2014, Torchlight bought 100% of the capital stock of McCabe's company, Hudspeth Oil Corporation. This gave Torchlight its flagship ~172,000 gross acres in Hudspeth County, Texas—the central asset John Brda hyped to public market investors for the next 7 years.

Plain-English Reality:

McCabe brought the actual oil property to the table. Before him, Torchlight was an obscure penny-stock shell with small, money-losing wells in Oklahoma and Kansas.

Proof: Purchase Agreement (August 7, 2014) & Form 10-Q (August 14, 2014)
Pillar 2 • Triple-Lock Downside Protection

The Overriding Royalty, Back-In & Reversion Safety Net

McCabe structured bulletproof downside protection: (1) A 4.5% Overriding Royalty Interest (ORRI) taking a cut off the top of all oil production, (2) A 10% back-in working interest after project payout, and (3) Strict reversionary rights ensuring that if Torchlight failed to meet continuous drilling deadlines, the acreage reverted back to McCabe. When Torchlight missed the March 31, 2015 drilling deadline, McCabe extracted 631,250 stock options at $0.36 just to grant an extension.

Plain-English Reality:

McCabe structured the contract so he couldn't lose. If Torchlight struck oil, he got paid off the top before Torchlight covered expenses. If Torchlight ran out of money and failed to drill, he took the land right back.

Proof: Purchase Agreement (Aug 7, 2014), Letter Option Agreement (March 30, 2015) & Schedule 13D
Pillar 3 • Boardroom Control & Voting Hegemony

Chairman of the Board & 17.09% Controlling Stake

In July 2016, McCabe joined Torchlight's Board of Directors, and in October 2016, became Chairman of the Board. By October 2020, McCabe beneficially owned 17,648,390 shares (17.09% of the company) directly and through McCabe Petroleum and G-Mc Exploration—including 4,000,000 shares issuable upon conversion of a 6% convertible note, completely dominating CEO John Brda's 2.34% stake.

Plain-English Reality:

John Brda was the public spokesperson and CEO on podcasts and Twitter, but Greg McCabe held the ultimate boardroom gavel and owned over seven times more equity than Brda.

Proof: Schedule 13D/A (October 13, 2020) & Form DEF 14A (September 18, 2020)
Pillar 4 • Chief Financier & Next Bridge CEO

Senior Secured Lender to Next Bridge Chairman & CEO

Because Torchlight burned cash every year and never produced positive operational cash flow, it relied on McCabe to stay solvent. When Torchlight sold $6M in Series C debt in October 2018, $3M was immediately paid to McCabe's MPC to repay loans. When assets spun into Next Bridge Hydrocarbons in 2022, McCabe assumed command as Chairman & CEO, holding 70,105,502 shares (26.49% control) as of March 2026. On May 28, 2024, McCabe filed an SEC S-1 offering 40M newly issued shares through Roth Capital to settle short positions, later admitting on camera: 'Not one single person has reached out to settle their bets.'

Plain-English Reality:

McCabe was Torchlight's private bank. In the end, he became Chairman and CEO of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, controlling more than a quarter of all company shares while taking $0 in salary, and directly orchestrating capital strategies to resolve short positions.

Proof: Next Bridge Form 10-K (Item 10 & Item 12, April 9, 2026) & Form S-1 (May 28, 2024)
Pillar 5 • Audited Sworn Admission

Note 1 Sworn Admission: Shareholders Caused MMTLP Trading

In Note 1 (Nature of Business) of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons’ audited Consolidated Financial Statements, management and auditors put into the official SEC record: "Certain holders of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock of Meta caused such shares to trade on the over-the-counter market (OTC) under the symbol MMTLP." This sworn admission directly refutes the popular internet conspiracy that FINRA or market makers illegally created the trading symbol without shareholder involvement.

Plain-English Reality:

Next Bridge admitted under federal securities laws that shareholders themselves caused MMTLP to begin trading OTC. It was not a rogue fabrication by Wall Street market makers.

Proof: Next Bridge Hydrocarbons Form 10-K (Note 1, Nature of Business, Dec 31, 2023)

The Partnership Dynamic: The Promoter vs. The Asset Holder

Torchlight was not run by John Brda alone. It was a symbiotic partnership between an OTC stock promoter and a Midland oilman.

AspectJohn A. Brda (The Promoter)Greg McCabe (The Asset Owner)
Background & CredentialsMicrocap financial consultant (B.S. Finance, SIU 1988) from Missouri specializing in reverse takeovers and promotional capital raises. Never held a FINRA securities license.Professional petroleum geologist (B.S. Geology, UT Arlington 1983) and independent operator with 42+ years in Midland, Texas drilling and managing Permian Basin acreage.
Corporate TitlePresident & CEO of Torchlight Energy (2014–2021). Stepped down upon Meta Materials merger; zero executive roles in Next Bridge Hydrocarbons.Chairman of Torchlight (2016–2021). Current Chairman of the Board AND Chief Executive Officer of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. (2022–present).
Equity Ownership (2020)2,318,322 common shares (2.34% voting stake).17,648,390 common shares (17.09% voting stake) — over 7x larger equity control.
Next Bridge Ownership (2026)Zero disclosed directorships or executive officer equity control tables.70,105,502 common shares (26.49% voting control) as disclosed in SEC Form 10-K filed April 9, 2026.
SEC Fraud Indictment & Banker ValuationsCharged with federal securities fraud and market manipulation (SEC v. Brda & Palikaras, Case 1:24-cv-04806) for hyping Orogrande values ($1–$20) while third-party investment banker valuations showed estimated asset values of less than $1.00 ($0.034 to $0.83/share).NOT charged in the SDNY complaint. Retained land rights, ORRI cuts, and promissory note claims while keeping his name off the promotional social media squeeze campaigns.
Promotional Strategy & The 3.5-Year SilenceSpearheaded viral retail squeeze campaigns on Twitter/X, YouTube podcasts, and private influencer text threads ("We have two days... to take advantage of the squeeze"), leading directly to federal securities fraud charges.Maintained deliberate 3.5-year public radio silence from Dec 2022 to Sept 2026. On Sept 25, 2026 (Going Rogue with Lara Logan, Ep 99.2), McCabe broke his silence, admitting: "I've been very cautious not to speak out until I let the process play out. The process has officially played out. It's taken three and a half years... right now it's time for our story to be told."
Short Settlement Offering (May 28, 2024)Zero corporate authority; faced SEC civil penalties and officer-and-director bars in SDNY federal court.As Next Bridge CEO, filed an SEC S-1 offering 40M newly issued shares through placement agent Roth Capital to let shorts close positions; admitted on camera that zero short sellers or brokers made an inquiry.
Recent Litigation & Anti-SLAPP Sanctions (Fall 2026)Active defendant in SDNY federal court facing SEC civil penalties, disgorgement, and a lifetime officer-and-director bar.On Sept 24, 2026, Next Bridge’s defamation lawsuit against critic Jeffrey Davies (Cause No. 2026-18186) was dismissed with prejudice in Harris County, TX under the Texas Anti-SLAPP Act (TCPA), hitting Next Bridge with mandatory fees and sanctions. On Oct 13, 2026, Judge Gary Spraker in Nevada Bankruptcy Court denied McCabe’s BaileyBridge, Inc. claim buyout.
Downside Protection & Cash FlowExecutive salary ($240k–$375k), bonus incentives, and change-of-control stock options.4.5% ORRI royalty off the top, 10% back-in interest, reversionary lease repossession, promissory notes repaid from public offerings, and $0 Next Bridge salary.
Forensic Analysis: Why Did the SEC Indict John Brda While Greg McCabe Was Not Charged?SEC v. Brda & Palikaras (Case 1:24-cv-04806)
1. Promotional Radio Silence

While John Brda spearheaded viral retail campaigns across Twitter, YouTube podcasts, and private text threads orchestrating the short squeeze (“We have two days... to take advantage of the squeeze”), McCabe maintained strict radio silence and made zero public meme-stock representations. On September 25, 2026 (Going Rogue with Lara Logan), McCabe confirmed on camera that this 3.5-year silence was deliberate: “I've been very cautious not to speak out until I let the process play out.”

2. The $137.5M ATM Equity Dump

The central predicate of the SEC's June 2024 fraud lawsuit was secretly unloading $137.5M into the inflated retail volume via the At-The-Market facility. Brda and Palikaras executed this dilution scheme; McCabe did not operate the ATM facility and did not dump his personal equity into the retail spike.

3. Next Bridge Hegemony (26.49%)

When Meta Materials spun the oil assets into Next Bridge Hydrocarbons in 2022, John Brda was completely excluded from any corporate or board role. Greg McCabe took total command as Chairman of the Board & CEO, controlling 70,105,502 shares (26.49% voting power) per the 2026 Form 10-K.

The Chapter 1 Takeaway on Greg McCabe

Without John Brda, Torchlight had no public ticker or stock promotion machine. Without Greg McCabe, Torchlight had no oil acreage, no board leadership, and no private credit line. By 2020, as debts crested $25M, McCabe and Brda were inseparable—and both were hunting for an exit to salvage their investment.

Scope: 2014 – Pre-Merger 2020
Act VI • Financial & Geological Autopsy

The 10-Year Operating Reality (2011–2020)

Did Torchlight ever turn an annual profit? Did they ever drill any oil wells? Here is the unvarnished corporate record documented directly in Torchlight's audited SEC Form 10-K filings.

Audited Proof • Form 10-K
Profitable Years
0 of 10 Years
100% Cash Burn History
Lifetime Deficit
-$111.9 Million
Dec 31, 2020 Balance Sheet
Proved Oil Reserves
$0.00 PV-10
Zero Commercial Reserves
Asset Write-Downs
-$37.1 Million
Hazel & Oklahoma Impaired
The Profit QuestionAUDITED 10-K

Sales: Yes • Profit: Never

Gross Sales: Torchlight generated roughly $13.9 million in cumulative oil and gas revenue across its entire 10-year public life (2011–2020), peaking in 2014 from Oklahoma wells.

Net Profit / Free Cash Flow: Never. Torchlight never turned an annual operating profit in its history. It lost money every single year, culminating in a lifetime deficit of -$111,935,597 (-$111.9 million) by December 31, 2020.

The Drilling QuestionFIELD AUDIT

Drilled: Yes • Commercial Reserves: Zero

Exploratory Holes: Torchlight participated in drilling dozens of test holes across Texas and Oklahoma.

The Geological Reality: The vast majority were exploratory test holes drilled strictly to satisfy continuous development deadlines so the leases wouldn't automatically forfeit, or non-operated minority interests later written down to zero.

In Plain English: What Does “$0.00 PV-10 Proved Reserves” Mean?

In petroleum engineering and SEC accounting, “PV-10” is the standardized present value of estimated future oil revenues, minus all production and development costs. When an oil company reports $0.00 in PV-10 reserves on its audited 10-K balance sheet, it means independent petroleum reserve engineers could not verify that any of the company's acreage could produce oil profitably at prevailing market prices.

The Audited 10-Year Financial Track Record (2011–2020)

Every figure below is transcribed verbatim from Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.'s audited Consolidated Statements of Operations filed on SEC Form 10-K:

Unit: USD ($)
Fiscal YearOil & Gas SalesOperating LossNet LossAccumulated Deficit
2011$130,422-$1,885,027-$2,829,885-$3,710,756
2012$1,385,821-$6,610,642-$8,740,798-$12,451,554
2013$2,367,078-$10,210,049-$12,842,525-$25,294,079
2014$5,455,555-$14,942,674-$17,126,504-$42,420,583
2015$1,291,018-$37,219,308-$37,256,128-$74,903,439
2016$486,962-$7,609,480-$7,684,346-$82,587,785
2017$570,499-$3,753,126-$919,910-$83,507,693
2018$1,282,362-$5,736,144-$5,806,612-$89,314,305
2019$746,263-$8,866,688-$9,839,396-$99,153,701
2020Pre-Merger$193,379-$9,378,820-$12,781,896-$111,935,597
10-Year Cumulative Totals$13,909,359-$106,211,958-$115,828,000-$111.9M Deficit
What Happened in 2020 (The Year Leading into Meta Materials)?

By 2020, Torchlight's operating business had practically stopped functioning:

  • Oil and gas sales cratered to $193,379 for the entire 12-month fiscal year.
  • Lease operating expenses were $188,481, leaving full-year gross profit of just $4,898 (less than five thousand dollars).
  • Meanwhile, General & Administrative (G&A) overhead—executive salaries, consulting, legal, and filing fees—was $3,526,700.
Federal Court Finding (SEC v. Brda & Palikaras, Case 1:24-cv-04806, ¶20):

“In early 2020, Torchlight was at a crossroads. It had sold all of its revenue-generating oil and gas assets, leaving Torchlight with oil and gas leases on only a few early-stage, exploratory properties. Torchlight's primary remaining oil and gas asset, the Orogrande Project, was undeveloped, had no proven oil and gas reserves, and covered significant areas of acreage far removed from existing proven geologic formations.”

Where Did Torchlight Actually Drill? (The Verified Drilling Record)

A comprehensive survey of Torchlight's four primary drilling plays documented in official SEC Form 10-K filings:

The interactive drilling map loads as you approach this section.

Project 1

Orogrande Project

Hudspeth County, TX
134,000 Net Acres

Drilled 9 exploratory test wells (Rich Whitaker, University Founders, Flying Cow). Drilled strictly to satisfy lease extensions so the land wouldn't revert to Texas universities.

Commercial Result:Zero Proved Reserves ($0.00 PV-10 value) on audited Form 10-K by Dec 31, 2020.
Project 2

Hazel Project

Midland Basin, TX
Upton & Reagan Co., TX

Drilled 6 vertical test holes and 1 horizontal well (Flying Cow #1). Minimal initial production followed by rapid pressure collapse.

Commercial Result:Total Failure: Torchlight abandoned drilling and took an $11,438,817 asset impairment write-down.
Project 3

Warwink / Winkler Project

Delaware Basin, TX
10.7% Working Interest

Non-operated minority interest in two horizontal Wolfcamp wells. Generated minor revenue before being sold off for cash to pay debts.

Commercial Result:Sold in November 2020 for cash to pay down secured promissory notes prior to the Meta merger.
Project 4

Oklahoma Hunton Play

Kingfisher & Logan Co., OK
15% – 25% Minority Interests

Participated in horizontal wells (Boeckman #1-H), generating the 2014 peak revenue bump ($5.4M). When oil crashed in late 2014, these deep, water-heavy wells became unviable.

Commercial Result:In 2015, under SEC ceiling test rules, Torchlight suffered a $25,674,123 asset impairment write-down at total loss.

Torchlight 10-Year Operating Summary Scorecard

Forensic QuestionAudited VerdictAudited SEC Record / Regulatory Evidence
Did Torchlight sell oil?YESAudited 10-Ks confirm ~$13.9M in cumulative revenue from 2011 to 2020.
Did Torchlight turn a profit?NONever had a profitable year; accumulated -$111.9M in net losses.
Did Torchlight drill wells?YESDrilled 9 test wells in Orogrande, 6 in Hazel, plus non-operated wells in Oklahoma and Winkler.
Did they have commercial reserves?NOBy Dec 31, 2020, official Form 10-K reported 0 proved reserves and $0.00 PV-10 standardized value for Orogrande.
Act VII • The Collapse (2019–2020)

The Downfall of Torchlight: The Road to Insolvency

How $25 million in liabilities, an impending Nasdaq delisting eviction, and contractual drill-or-die lease deadlines pushed Torchlight to the edge of bankruptcy—forcing management to shop its public shell to waste recyclers and IT repair companies before Meta Materials ever arrived.

Death Spiral • Pre-Merger
In Plain English: Why Torchlight Was Desperate to Sell

By 2020, Torchlight was running out of oxygen. If they couldn't get their stock price back above $1.00, Nasdaq would kick them off the exchange. If they didn't drill 4 expensive deep wells in West Texas, they lost their land leases. And with $25 million in maturing debt and almost no revenue, they couldn't afford to do either. Their only hope of survival was finding a private company willing to buy their Nasdaq listing.

Part 1: The Triple Trap (Late 2019 – Early 2020)

3 Simultaneous Crises

By early 2020, Torchlight was cornered from three distinct financial and regulatory angles simultaneously:

Trap 1 • Debt WallForm 10-K

$25M Liabilities vs. Zero Cash

Torchlight entered 2020 carrying $25,000,000 in liabilities against less than $1M in liquid cash. Millions were in convertible promissory notes (short-term corporate loans where the lender can demand cash or take shares of stock).

The Emergency:
On April 7, 2020 (Form 8-K), Torchlight begged noteholders for an emergency 10-day extension on $8.5 million in notes due April 10 because the company had no cash to pay them.
Trap 2 • DelistingRule 5550(a)(2)

The Nasdaq 180-Day Countdown

Torchlight stock dropped below $1.00 in October 2019. On November 21, 2019, Nasdaq issued a formal Deficiency Notice (an official eviction warning that a company has broken exchange rules).

The Threat:
If TRCH failed to maintain a $1.00 bid price for 10 straight days, it faced expulsion to the unlisted OTC pink sheets—which would cut off institutional capital and trigger loan defaults.
Trap 3 • Lease MandateSEC Docket ¶21

University Lands: Drill or Die

Under Torchlight's lease agreement with University Lands (the Texas agency overseeing public university oil lands), Torchlight had to drill 4 new wells before end of 2021, and 5 more in subsequent years.

The Penalty:
If Torchlight failed to drill these multi-million-dollar test holes, its entire 134,000-acre Orogrande lease was automatically forfeited and erased.
June 2, 2020 • Board DirectiveSEC Proxy Statement DEFM14A, p. 104

The Board Abandons Oil & Begins The Hunt for a Reverse Merger Partner

On June 2, 2020, the Torchlight Board of Directors convened to confront the company's insolvency amidst the pandemic oil collapse. John Brda informed the board that Torchlight could no longer survive as an independent oil exploration operator.

The Board formally authorized management to pursue “Strategic Alternatives”—the corporate finance euphemism for liquidating or merging the business before bankruptcy. On July 28, 2020, Torchlight hired investment bank Roth Capital Partners to shop the corporate vehicle. Crucially, the Board specifically instructed management to target companies outside of the oil and gas sector that wanted a backdoor Nasdaq listing.

Part 3: The Desperate Garage Sale (May – August 2020)

Sworn SEC regulatory disclosures (Form DEFM14A, pp. 104–105) prove that before Metamaterial Inc. ever called, Torchlight tried to sell its public shell to anyone who would listen:

5 Failed Negotiations
1. Company AMay – July 2020

Waste Recycling Business

Exchanged technical data and held reverse merger calls for 7 weeks.

Why It Failed:

Collapsed July 15. Company A demanded Torchlight sell off all oil assets before closing, which Torchlight couldn't do.

2. Company BMay – August 2020

Virtual Events & Work-From-Home App

Videoconferences with Brda and Chairman McCabe; exchanged multiple draft term sheets.

Why It Failed:

Collapsed in August over major valuation disputes and inability to resolve oil asset disposal.

3. Company CAugust 2020

Merchant Services & Blockchain Crypto

Signed confidentiality agreement August 28 and shared due diligence info.

Why It Failed:

Company C demanded an excessively high self-valuation and insisted oil assets be liquidated prior to closing.

4. Company DAugust 18, 2020

Third-Party IT Maintenance

Signed confidentiality agreement August 18 and reviewed corporate books.

Why It Failed:

Collapsed immediately because Company D's proposed valuation left virtually zero equity value for Torchlight.

5. Company EAugust 19 – 25, 2020

Electric Vehicle (EV) Manufacturer

Brda and McCabe held virtual meetings with principals. On August 25, 2020, John Brda personally flew to Company E's corporate headquarters to tour the vehicle plant and exchange draft term sheets.

Why It Failed:

Collapsed due to an extreme discrepancy between Company E's demanded valuation and what Torchlight could offer.

The Turning Point • Late August 2020

5 Rejections, $25M in Debt, and Weeks Left Before Delisting

By late August 2020, every single non-oil suitor had rejected Torchlight. The company was out of cash, facing an active Nasdaq delisting countdown, trapped under a contractual mandate to drill 4 deep test holes in Hudspeth County, and buried under $25 million in maturing liabilities.

Federal Court Finding (SEC v. Brda & Palikaras, Docket ¶20):

“In early 2020, Torchlight was at a crossroads. It had sold all of its revenue-generating oil and gas assets, leaving Torchlight with oil and gas leases on only a few early-stage, exploratory properties. Torchlight's primary remaining oil and gas asset, the Orogrande Project, was undeveloped, had no proven oil and gas reserves, and covered significant areas of acreage far removed from existing proven geologic formations.”

Then, in the first days of September 2020, Torchlight's investor relations representative made a phone call and arranged a virtual meeting with George Palikaras, CEO of a Canadian cleantech company called Metamaterial Inc.... setting up the dramatic chain of events in Chapter 2.

Forensic Market Autopsy • 10-Year Trading Trajectory

Torchlight (TRCH) Stock History (2010–2021)

From an OTC Pink penny stock with $0 commercial oil reserves to a hyped meme stock reaching $10.88 intraday ($21.76 split-adjusted)—explore the audited price history, the debt conversion floors, and the $137.5M ATM offering dump.

Audited 10-K & SEC Docket
Historical Low
$0.21
March 2020 COVID Crash
All-Time High (Raw)
$10.88
June 21, 2021 Intraday
Split-Adjusted High
$21.76
1:2 Reverse Split Basis
ATM Cash Extracted
$137.5M
16.2M Shares @ $8.50 Avg
In Plain English: Did TRCH Peak at $10.88 or $21.76?

Both numbers are correct depending on how you view the chart. On June 21, 2021, Torchlight stock actually printed an intraday record of $10.88 per share on your broker screen before the merger. Seven days later on June 28, 2021, Torchlight performed a 1-for-2 reverse split. Under reverse split accounting, every 2 shares merged into 1 share, mathematically doubling past prices to $21.76 on historical charting software like TradingView and Bloomberg.

ERA:
PRICE BASIS:
$0.00$3.25$6.50$9.75$13.00$1.00 NASDAQ LINEPEAK: $10.88Q4 2010Q3 2012Q2 2014Q1 2016Q4 2017Q4 2020Jun 25, 2021Jun 28, 2021
HISTORIC PEAKJun 21, 2021 (2021-06-21)
HIGH:$10.88
LOW:$8.50
CLOSE:$9.92

The $10.88 Intraday Peak ($21.76 Split-Adjusted)

All-time record peak: $10.88 unadjusted / $21.76 post-split adjusted. Over 200 million shares trade in a single session amid peak retail euphoria.

Docket Receipt:SEC v. Brda Complaint Para 95 & Barchart
Click or hover any data dot on the chart to inspect verified SEC prices & corporate events.
Phase 1 • 2011–2014The Boeckman Peak

The Only Revenue Era ($6.75 High)

Torchlight up-listed from OTCBB to Nasdaq. When the Boeckman 1-14 well in Oklahoma produced oil, shares surged to an unadjusted peak of $6.75. In 2014, Torchlight generated its lifetime revenue peak of $5.4 million before production steepened and global oil prices collapsed.

Phase 2 • 2015–2020The Impairment Abyss

The $0.21 Floor & Delisting Threat

A -$25.6M ceiling test write-down gutted the balance sheet. Greg McCabe took control of the board in exchange for Midland and Orogrande acreage. By 2020, with $25M in liabilities and negative crude oil prices, shares fell to $0.21, triggering Nasdaq minimum bid eviction warnings.

Phase 3 • June 2021The Meme Liquidation

The $10.88 Squeeze & $137.5M ATM

Promoted by Brda and Palikaras, retail volume pushed shares from $3.58 on June 14 to $10.88 intraday on June 21. While retail bought the squeeze, Torchlight dumped 16.2M shares at $8.50 average price into the market, extracting $137.5M in cash before the 1:2 reverse split wiped out equity.

Act IV • Primary Regulatory Evidence Repository

Chapter 1 Regulatory & Judicial Evidence

Every statement in this chapter is verified by primary SEC EDGAR submissions and federal court dockets. Direct links to unredacted primary records.

Court of Law Standard
Form S-1May 2, 2008

Pole Perfect Public Stock Registration

The original registration statement filed by founder Tammy Skalko to take her home-based Florida pole dancing fitness studio public as an SEC-reporting penny stock.

Form DAugust 9, 2010

Private Torchlight Energy Securities Offering

The initial SEC filing for private Torchlight. Officially designates John A. Brda as Promoter and significant shareholder alongside oil exploration manager Thomas Lapinski.

Form 8-KNovember 1, 2010

Termination of LumiGene Biotech LOI

Filed 22 days before Torchlight signed: Pole Perfect announces its prior reverse merger collapsed and that it is actively investigating other acquisition targets on the shell market.

Form 8-KNovember 24, 2010

Share Exchange & Reverse Takeover Closing

Documents the reverse takeover: Pole Perfect Studios terminates its fitness operations, buys private Torchlight, pays $270k cash to cancel founder shares, and hands 58% majority control to Lapinski and Brda.

Schedule 13DDecember 3, 2010

John Brda Beneficial Ownership (20.5% Stake)

Official SEC disclosure confirming John Brda acquired 628,125 common shares (20.5% voting control) individually and through his consulting firm Brda & Company LLC.

Schedule 14CJanuary 13, 2011

Official Rebranding to Torchlight Energy

Notifies stockholders that majority owners amended the Nevada corporate charter to officially rename the company Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.

Form 8-KNovember 25, 2019

Nasdaq $1.00 Minimum Bid Price Deficiency Notice

Official disclosure that Nasdaq issued a deficiency notice under Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) because Torchlight stock traded below $1.00 for 30 consecutive business days, initiating the 180-day delisting countdown.

Form 8-KApril 7, 2020

Emergency $8.5M Promissory Note Extension

Facing the impending maturity of $8,500,000 in promissory notes due April 10, 2020, cash-starved Torchlight had to negotiate an emergency 10-day extension to April 20, 2020.

Form 10-KMarch 18, 2021

2020 Audited Annual Report (Final TRCH 10-K)

The final 10-K before the Meta merger: proves 10-year cumulative deficit of -$111.9M, 2020 gross profit of just $4,898 vs. $3.5M G&A, and 0 proved reserves ($0.00 PV-10 value) for Orogrande.

Form DEFM14AMay 7, 2021

Definitive Merger Proxy (5 Failed Suitors)

Sworn SEC regulatory narrative detailing Torchlight’s desperate May–August 2020 shopping tour to reverse-merge into non-oil companies: Company A (waste recycling), B (virtual events), C (blockchain settlement), D (IT maintenance), and E (electric vehicles).

Court DocketJune 25, 2024

SEC Federal Civil Fraud Lawsuit (SDNY)

The SEC’s landmark federal fraud complaint detailing Torchlight’s $25M debt wall, zero proved reserves, mandatory Orogrande drilling deadlines, and how Brda schemed to manipulate stock prices to dump ATM equity.

Admin OrderJune 25, 2024

SEC Admin Order File No. 3-21976 (Pre-Planned Spinoff)

The SEC officially found that as early as December 2020, Brda and insiders were already planning the spin-off into Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, paying $20k/month to an intermediary for ghost consulting. Meta was assessed a $1M penalty, which defaulted when Meta filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Form 10-KApril 9, 2026

Sworn Note 1 Admission: Shareholders Caused MMTLP Trading

Under penalty of federal law, Next Bridge formally admitted: "Certain holders of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock of Meta caused such shares to trade on the over-the-counter market (OTC) under the symbol MMTLP." This completely debunks the myth that market makers or FINRA illegally fabricated the ticker without shareholder involvement.

Court OrderSeptember 24, 2026

Next Bridge v. Jeffrey Davies: Anti-SLAPP Dismissal & Sanctions

Judge Lee Kathryn Shuchart dismissed Next Bridge’s defamation lawsuit against critic Jeffrey Davies with prejudice in its entirety. The Court ruled Davies is entitled to mandatory court costs, attorney’s fees, and statutory sanctions against Next Bridge under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 27.009.

Court RulingOctober 13, 2026

In re Meta Materials: Judge Spraker Denies McCabe Claim Buyout

Judge Gary Spraker denied Chapter 7 Trustee Christina Lovato’s motion to sell the estate’s avoidance claims to Greg McCabe’s shell entity BaileyBridge, Inc. for $250k + 20%, after shareholder Danielle Spears (Doc #3007) and Scott Traudt (Doc #2990) exposed undisclosed tolling agreements and lack of fair bidding.

Available Now • Chapter 2
Meta Materials (MMAT) Era

The Meta Materials Reverse Merger & The Squeeze Campaign

How a desperate oil company facing Nasdaq delisting struck a reverse merger deal with George Palikaras, created the Series A Preferred dividend placeholder, dumped 16.2 million shares at the top of a retail short squeeze, and triggered the June 2024 SEC civil securities fraud complaint.

The Short Squeeze

TRCH stock pumps over 200% in a week in June 2021 as retail investors pile into the dividend rumor.

ATM Cash Machine

Torchlight sells 16.2 million shares into retail market volume, raising $137.5 million in cash.

The MMTLP Dividend

The non-voting Series A Preferred shares unexpectedly trade on OTC pink sheets under ticker MMTLP.

SEC Fraud Indictment

Federal prosecutors and SEC charge Brda and Palikaras in federal district court (SDNY) in June 2024.

Chapter 2: The Canadian Cleantech Takeover & Short SqueezeRead Chapter 2 Now